Fast Food Nation Chapter 4 Question

1. The legal issues that have been involved is inflated prices charged by suppliers, terminations and bankruptcies that seemed unfair
2. Subway has been in more legal disputes that burger king, kfc, mcdonalds, pizza hut, taco bell, and wendys combined. The legal issuses Subway has been involved with is the problems with opening new subways and paying their agents. They're constantly trying to open new subways regardless of how the other subways near by are doing.

Fast Food Nation Chapter 3 Question

I think they have not formed unions because they are afraid the workers might fight against them. The management knows they do things wrong so forming the union would only hurt them. The workers would then be able to defend themselves when they are treated badly and it would hurt the restuarant.

Fast Food Nation Chapter 2 Question

They marketed to children by all different types of media and even went as far as offering a free toy with the kids meal. They also started to include playgrounds in the restaurants. When they have all that stuff the kids are more attracted to those things so they want to eat there. Then the company started to compete with bozo the clown by creating their own character, Ronald McDonald. They started making other characters too like the hamburgerlar and more. I think they targeted children because they are more gullable and give in easily to bribes like the free toys.

Fast Food Nation Intro and Chapter 1 Questions

Intro- The people know the food is unhealthy but they still buy it because its cheap and convenient

Chapter 1- I think because there are so many immigrants in California they were willing to work for anything so the wages are low. Then they have more money to build a new restaurant.

Argument Source #4

Argument Source #3

Neurosurgeon murdered dog to demonstrate medical device.

1. Briefly (2-3 sentences) summarize the article.
2. Explain the passage's CENTRAL ARGUMENT. What claims does the author make?
3. Find TWO ASSERTIONS that support the central argument. Explain how each assertion contributes to the author's main argument.

Argument Source #2

Animals should not be used for medical experimentation.

1. Some people think that animal testing should be banned. They believe that there are other options available instead of animals. Some people dont see the effects of animal testing. They say that until they find another option animal is the most ethical way.
2. The claim is that animal testing should be banned.
3. Assertion 1: animal testing should be outlawed because it is hurtful and not necessary.
this is the main argument of the article she tries to defend the animals.
assertion 2: